Sunday, September 11, 2011

Sponsored networks and outbound roamer steering

There are different solutions allowing small operators to be able to inter-operate with quite large number of partner operators without the need of individual interworking agreements. Such solutions enable the new operators a global coverage with the support of the sponsor network.

Both sponsored and sponsor networks employ some products (which some might be called as roaming replicator), to make the message originated from sponsored network look like it is sponsor network’s traffic. Sponsor network route the traffic for the sponsored network properly too, which allows the sponsored network to access all the partners of the sponsor network.


As shown in the figure, when a subscriber attempts to camp to a network which receives service from a sponsor network, the registration request arrives from sponsor network to the HPLMN HLR. As the replicator products change both SCCP calling and VLR addresses with IMSI, from the point of HPLMN the subscriber is like being abroad in sponsor network country.

Issues with steering
Operators may prefer their outbound roamers to register to certain operators even though they may have roaming agreements with many operators in the same country. The motivation of having “preferred” partners can be cost (having discounts) or technical reasons (like better Camel / data support).

Steering solutions determine the country of the outbound roamer and try to steer the subscriber to a preferred partner using different methods. While one of the methods is network based steering which intercepts the subscribers’ registration messages, another method is SIM based steering which updates the preferred list of the subscriber’s SIM properly for the country.

For the sponsored network as the VPLMN, the HPLMN believes that the subscriber is trying to register to sponsor network actually. Besides this confusion, concluding the subscriber is at another country (Country Y instead of X) is a worse problem. There might be different settings for two countries and if the parameters are looser for the sponsor network’s country, this will cause problems for you.

The sponsor network might be a preferred partner and this prevents you to steer the subscriber to the preferred partners in country X. This may not be a problem if the sponsor network is “more preferred” than your preferred partners in the sponsored network’s country. But for the other case, this may mean that you lose some revenue.

Even though the sponsor network is more preferred than any preferred partner in the sponsored network’s country, you still should fix this case with configuration of the steering solution; to be able to retrieve correct reports grouped by countries.

Solution
Sponsor networks let the partners know about the sponsored network in general. They may publish the sponsorship as well the GT prefix for the VLRs used for that sponsored network. What you should do is to look for such publications from partner networks and alter the settings for your steering solution.

You will possibly need to create a new network to represent the sponsored network with the published GT range from the sponsor network's GT range. Considering your steering solutions allows that, then you should assign this new created network to the country / zone of the sponsored network.

With such setting, you will be able to correctly perform steering configuration for both sponsor and sponsored networks' countries. As roaming business is a considerable part of the revenues of the operators, having correct steering settings can be crucial to keep the costs minimized.

Saturday, July 23, 2011

Trusting Google blindfolded

Or maybe I should have picked a title like “do not trust Google Maps picking a route for you”. It was my first time using Google Maps when I was driving between different spots during the vacation. It was always OK to use it in the city or at the main roads interconnecting cities. With this experience I had a trust using Google Maps on the smartphone so that I did not even need to follow road signs.

All rights reserved by jhellfire2000

Ending up in the field with pomegranate trees  following this route for Dalyan to Sarıgerme made me notice that Google may have erroneous data too.

Things started to go wrong at step 3, seeing that the road is not as straight as Google thinks so; but it was heading where Google promised to. I kept following and ended in the field. Too bad I was not driving a 4WD to follow Google's route comfortably.


It was not Google's mistake actually as Google is working with local providers for maps, like this map was provided by BaşarSoft. Checking the web I noticed I am not the only one having this problem.

This little experience made me notice there is still a lot to depend on online maps blindfolded.

Friday, July 01, 2011

Touristy spots of Istanbul

Coming across the World touristiness map and The Geotaggers' World Atlas by Eric Fischer online, I wondered Istanbul’s popularity map. While Eric Fischer’s map for Istanbul could give an idea about the popular spots, what it really provides is the mobility map of the photographers.

The different colors represent different modes of transportation: Black is walking (less than 7mph), Red is bicycling or equivalent speed (less than 19mph), Blue is motor vehicles on normal roads (less than 43mph); Green is freeways or rapid transit.

While world touristiness map provides the popularity info, the resolution is too low to check the popularity at the city level.

Inspired with both ideas I downloaded the locations of all 100K+ geotagged pictures taken around Istanbul at Flickr. Below is the heatmap produced with pictures since the beginning of 2010. While it would be faster to create small grids of the city and download only the number of pictures for each grid (like what "world touristiness map" did possibly), this would not be able to create a high precision map. Because of this, I tried to download all the picture coordinates.


It is no surprise that the most hot area is the historical part of the city and by Bosphorus. The spots on the sea are mostly on the route of ferry lines.


Knowing the city a bit, you could expect this result before trying to plot the pictures. But still if you do not know the city very well, it can teach you new spots close to the city to see like those small red dots at northern part.